The Theme of Julius Caesar Essay - 2961 Words

The Theme of Julius Caesar How suitably is the theme of the supernatural depicted in the play ‘Julius Caesar’? William Shakespeare was one of the most influential playwrights, is known today for his plays such as Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, A Midsummer Nights Dream and many other interesting and different plays. We in the 21st century enjoy Shakespeare’s plays for a variety of reasons. His plays have different themes like love, ambition, pride, friendship, supernatural, etc. His language is rich and full of imagery. Many of his famous quotes are used even till today such as To be, or not to be and O Romeo, Romeo! wherefore art thou Romeo?-Romeo and Juliet, form some of literatures most†¦show more content†¦One of the functions of Shakespeare’s poetry is to communicate to the audience in an imaginative manner. Through his vivid language he is able to create, the setting, portray the character and the emotional atmosphere of the scene. The Elizabethan audience believed deeply in the supernatural and superstition. They hungered for it. The use of unnatural events had a significant topical interest for the Elizabethan audience. The Elizabethans believed that the appearance of spirits was accompanied by a wind. It is also effective as a modern stage effect. In modern the atre, ghosts and supernatural occurrences are difficult to stage. The audiences of today are used to â€Å"realistic† theatre, such as Shakespeare’s ghost are produced on our stages with strange lightning effects, off-stage sounds. The Elizabethans had no such problem. They just accepted ghosts and witches as the case may be. This is how the supernatural would have had a lasting impression on them. Shakespeare’s development of style falls into quite a well-defined progression. At first he wrote plays according to the tradition of his rivals. He soon began experimenting with technique. His main concern was with tricks of language. He was finding out just what he could do. His use of language has made him the greatest figure in English, and perhaps in any literature. At the same time,Show MoreRelatedJulius Caesar - Theme of Friendship951 Words   |  4 Pageshad sealed the fate of Julius Caesar, and Brutus, Cassius, and all the other conspirators knew that they could use this to their advantage, and to Caesars disadvantage. Friendship, was what the conspirators used as a cover to blind Caesar from the truth, just as a hunter uses camouflage to keep the animals from seeing what he is up to. The conspirators also used camouflage, but they used flattery along with manipulation as a way to soothe any feelings of doubt that Caesar may have had about theirRead MoreTheme Of M anipulation In Julius Caesar724 Words   |  3 Pagessincere before showing their true colors to benefit themselves for success. Those people also usually master deception to trick others into accepting artificial personalities before revealing the truth. Shakespeare uses the character Cassius in Julius Caesar, to show how manipulation is done by demonstrating inner thoughts, the comparison of characters, and writing of letters throughout the play. For instance, the character Cassius uses his inner thoughts of to take control of Brutus’ thinking. CassiusRead MoreTheme Of Omens In Julius Caesar1008 Words   |  5 Pagesmotif in his tragedy, Julius Caesar. Throughout the play, there are plenty of mystifying omens present.Characters in Julius Caesar either ignore, misinterpret, or acknowledge these omens, and this typically leads to tragedy. Shakespeare employs this motif as a means of showing his audience that they must accept the truth as is rather than how they wish for it be. Omens are not meant to be ignored, yet some characters still choose to ignore them. The protagonist, Julius Caesar, ignores the most importantRead MoreTheme Of Manipulation In Julius Caesar1104 Words   |  5 PagesTragedy of Julius Caesar, by guards, wives, citizens, and especially, by Cassius and Antony. Ambition is each of their flaws, and they both act as catalysts for the plot, further escalating the situation in Rome, after the death of Pompey. Wars are started, innocents are killed, and lives are ruined, due to manipulation and its impacts on others. It’s not just a fictional thing either, manipulation is everywhere, and it’s had real-life consequences. However, the tale of Julius Caesar does a greatRead MoreThemes Of William Shakespeare s Julius Caesar 2063 Words   |  9 Pages Theme, Mood and Conflict in Julius Caesar Savannah Baine â€Å"Come I to speak at Caesar’s funeral. He was my friend, faithful and just to me. But Brutus says that he was too ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man .† Mark Antony (Act 3,Scene 2,Line 85). â€Å"Julius Caesar† by William Shakespeare, is a classic play depicting the death of Caesar and the chaos that ensues afterwards. One theme in this play is fate vs. free will, the mood is seriousRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Macbeth Essay1207 Words   |  5 Pageslike Macbeth or Julius Caesar. The protagonists Macbeth and Banquo conquer the evils that face them throughout the plot. However, the nature of violence that takes place throughout Shakespeare’s plays is in relation toâ€Å"the source of the killing of the soul†(Macbeth and the Nature of Evil). In Macbeth, Macbeth is known as a superhuman warrior, the characteristics of being brave and having ambition. The main reason evil stirs up violence can be seen as examples in Macbeth and Julius Caesa r, which is causedRead MoreA Powerful Weapon: Words that Persuade in Shakespeare ´s The Tragedy of Julius Ceasar565 Words   |  3 Pagespersuade people, it can lead to chaos. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare portrays a universal theme in which friends and enemies turn to against each other, and a war stimulates out of lies and ambition for power. The usage of old and wise words to manipulated people lead to great revelry. In the beginning of the play, one important aspect of the theme is when Cassius tries to persuade Brutus to join sides with the party against Julius Caesar. Cassius needs to be clever and convincing, and heRead MoreThe Play Julius Caesar Performed In The Theatre In The1362 Words   |  6 PagesThe play Julius Caesar performed in the theatre in the round, though captivating left the play confusing in some aspects. In this performance of Julius Caesar the time period was a bit confusion to pick out. Of course the original is supposed to be depicted in roman times of when there was a republic present as the government, but in many renditions of the play the director has changed the setting. The director of this play, Sara Becker, did not make it easy to pick out the intricate and generalRead MoreRhetoric and Betrayal in Julius Caeser Play1486 Words   |  6 PagesWilliam Shakespeare’s famous play Julius Caesar utilizes the literary element of rhetoric multiple times throughout to show the true power that words can hold. The rhetoric in Caesar accompanies the play’s themes of betrayal, deception, and exaggeration. Brutus uses rhetoric to persuade the crowd of plebeians that the murdering of Caesar was positive and beneficial to all of Rome, winning their support and causing them to join his cause. Soon after, Mark Antony gives a terrifically-persuasive speechRead MoreHow Portents, Omens and Dreams Add to the Dramatic Tension Before Julius Caesars murder in Julius Caesar989 Words   |  4 PagesHow Portents, Omens and Dreams Add to the Dramatic Tension Before Julius Caesars murder in Julius Caesar Julius Caesar is one of Shakespeares greatest plays because in it he deals powerfully and excitingly with the themes of power and conscience. Particularly in Julius Caesar Shakespeare uses disruptions as portents, omens and predictions to give us a sense of approach of terrible events. Shakespeare lived the Elizabethan period; therefore like many Elizabethans he would

Essay about Rhetorical Analysis of Antony’s Funeral Speech

On the Ides of March in 44 B.C., Roman Emperor Julius Caesar was stabbed to death by a group of prominent politicians led by Marcus Brutus. The sudden death of Caesar created a power vacuum which gave rise of a two factions, one headed by Brutus and Cassius and the other by Antony and the future triumvirs. Shortly after Caesar’s death, Antony spoke at his funeral and used the opportunity to lead the Roman people away from Brutus and back to believing in Caesar and consequently, the Second Triumvirate. By combining a subtle use of questions and interjections to keep audience engaged, a variety of rhetorical devices devices that dignify Caesar and himself, and an effective use of all three modes of persuasion, Antony is able to convert the†¦show more content†¦However, the most important use of a rhetorical question is in the last line where he challenges his audience if there â€Å"comes such another [Caesar]?†. Here the rhetorical question serves to summarize t he greatness of Caesar and to pass the responsibility for future actions onto the listeners. As a result, the people will be more likely to act against the conspirators after they have realized there will not be anyone as good as Caesar. By keeping his listeners thoroughly engaged, Antony is able to further develop on his purpose by utilizing diverse rhetorical devices. Near the beginning, he makes effective use of parallelism to list Caesar’s selfless deeds, like â€Å"when that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept†, which gives the effect that the list is so long that Antony cannot describe it in unique detail. Additionally, his parallel repetition of â€Å"Brutus says he was ambitious and Brutus is an honorable man† serves as sarcasm. By repeating each good action with these two lines, Antony is getting the audience to contrast Caesar’s endless good deeds with Brutus’s repetitive and conflicting argument. Further on in the speech, Antony uses proslepsis somewhat obviously to reveal Caesar’s will to the people. He tells them that he found â€Å"a parchment with the seal of Caesar...tis his will†, yet quickly stops himself from telling anymore. Therefore, the audie nce is intrigued by the will and its mention reengages any listeners whoShow MoreRelatedRhetoric and Betrayal in Julius Caeser Play1486 Words   |  6 PagesAntony gives a terrifically-persuasive speech that he claims to be a funeral oration for Caesar, but is truly a cleverly-shrouded undermining to Brutus’s speech. Antony’s speech is able to not only gain him the crowd’s support, but causes the crowd to completely disregard what Brutus had said only moments earlier. The persuasion and manipulation used by the characters throughout this piece of literature, shows how rhetorical modes of persuasion, rhetorical devices, and cultural experiences can combineRead MoreJulius Caesar Brutus and Mark Antony Speech Comparison Essay597 Words   |  3 PagesFebruary 2013 Speech Analysis The speeches given by both Brutus and Mark Antony in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar are very persuasive to the audience that they are given to, but rhetorical devices were used in different ways in order for each to have an effect on the people of Rome. In Brutus’s speech, he uses devices such as rhetorical question and antithesis to convince the Romans that he and the conpirators did a good deed by killing Caesar. In Mark Antony’s speech, he swaysRead MoreRhetorical Analysis of Antonys Speech 3.2842 Words   |  4 PagesRhetorical Analysis of Antony’s Speech In Julius Caesar, Mark Antony is given the opportunity to speak at Caesar’s funeral by the conspirators the murdered him. Through his words, Antony seeks to cause dissent and let mischief reign over his audience, the plebeians of Rome. Antony uses rhetorical questioning to provoke the crowd into a fit of rage over Brutus’ words. Antony disguises his true intents in his speech, putting him at a moral high ground over Brutus. He finally uses ambiguous meaningsRead MoreThe Role of Persuasion in Julius Caesar Essay examples1066 Words   |  5 Pagespersuade others. Persuasion is used very effectively when Anthony addresses a speech to the citizens of Rome. He manipulates the crowd and uses persuasion effectively and he shows the use of irony to turn the crowd against Brutus and the conspirators. Antony states â€Å"He was my friend, faithful and just to me (III.ii.82–96)† ).Through this statement, he had grasped the audiences’ attention as this statem ent states Antony’s close relationship with Caesar. Antony later states â€Å"But Brutus says he was ambitiousRead MoreJulius Caesar by William Shakespeare2100 Words   |  9 Pagesaddressing the plebeians after Caesar’s death. This essay will be divided into two sections to explore the ways in which Antony is depicted as better leader. The First section will contextualise the extracts used for analysis, and compare Brutus’s pedestrian speech with Mark Antony’s impressive oratory. This will be done by defining what rhetoric is, and how it is used by Antony to win over the plebeians in comparison with Brutus. The second section will use examples taken from Machiavelli’s The PrinceRead MoreA Multiple Choice Test on Julius Caesar1967 Words   |  8 Pages_____ 3. Octavius _____ 4. Artemidorus _____ 5. Brutus _____ 6. Caesar _____ 7. Casca _____ 8. Calpurnia _____ 9. Mark Antony _____ 10. Portia _____ 11.Lepidus _____ 12. Decius _____ 13. Pindarus _ ____ 14. Cassius _____ 15. Soothsayer A. Captured by Antonys soldiers, mistaken for Brutus B. Persuades Caesar to attend Senate meeting C. First to stab Caesar D. convinces Brutus to join conspiracy with false letters E. Holds the sword for Brutus to kill himself F. Wife of Brutus G. The least important member

Change Agent Strategy Change Management

Question: Discuss about the Change Agent Strategy for Change Management. Answer: Every organization requires change agent for bringing the change in the environment of the organization. A change agent has the skill to coordinate and facilitate the change effort. Change agents can be internal such as manager or employees and can be external such as consultants. The success of the change agent entirely depends on the ability of work of relationship between change agent and the decision maker. Changes in management will be reflecting in this essay. Change efforts should be designed so that employee of the organization gets rewards and motivated environment (Lunenburg, 2010). It is necessary to diagnose the issue. It should be analyzed with better understanding and oversee the impact on long term as well as short term on business result. Interpretations of hopes regarding change management should be done by keeping in mind of vision statement. There are so many companies that bring changes in its organization. A big company like Cisco undertakes huge reorganization a nd promotes leader and employee from one department to another. The process of change management is the sequence of steps that leaders or change agent need to consider and follow while making changes in an organization. It is required to work on best practices and communication for successful change process. It is necessary for the change agent or manager to consider the aspects which is required for change. Best practices are having the more weight with higher management. To make changes in an organization, manager should be aware about the environment and need of the organization (Jain, 2011). For successful change in the organization communication should be done in effective manner between employee and manager. For instance, to making changes in business change agent appointed completer. The role of completer is to protect the organization from mistakes. It is necessary to provide the complete information about the change to the whole staff so that misunderstanding could not take place in the organization. Completer takes care of all aspects such as emergency, task completion, deadlines, observance of targets and follow-up. As per beblin theory, the result of the work of completer would be positive because the ability of completer has combine of sense of concerns with aim. The theory for change management has potential benefits and weakness. There are several models which can give benefits to the organization in case of change management. Mckinsey 7S Model has the ability maintain the existence of management eve when trends came in or went out from the organization. It in cludes strategy, structure, system, shared values, staff, skills, and style. Strategy is the first step of change management. Chair person plays a major role to develop the strategy in the organization. Chair person is the person who takes use of resources in the best way after recognizing the strength and weaknesses of the group. The next step of Mckinsey 7S model is structure which refers the way in which organization follows the stages or structure. System is the next step of it in which day to day activities are mentioned. Chairperson performs his role in this step by analyzing the working activities of the staff. Shared value keeps importance high in the organization. It is also referred as core value. It is developed by the chairperson or leader of the organization and followed by everyone in the organization. Style is the manner in which changes in the organization is adopted by employees. Staff is the major part of the organization, it refers to the workforce. A skill is the last step of Mckinsey that shows the capability and competencies of the workers in the organization. This model provides the better understanding. Along with this model, the positive quality of chairperson such as communication ability, sense of timing and balance helps to the organization to put this model effectively. This model considers almost all important aspect. The disadvantage of this model is complexity because it is not easy as others. The key point of group dynamic theory is that group should be more productive and positive towards handling the project. The role of group dynamic in OD is to encouraging the group to do more group discussion and treat each other with descent manner. Organizational development is the nature of continuous process. It contains evaluation, implementation and action planning. The main focus of OD is to transferring the knowledge to organization so that improvement can be done in the context of managing future change and solving problems. Organistional strategies contain four steps in it. Diagnosis, action planning, intervention and evaluation are the steps of OD. Diagnosis works to find the problems of organization. It is done by OD by examining the mission, vision, policies, structure and technologies. Action planning is a process which assesses the comfort ability of making different changes in the organization. Intervention refers the sequence of the implemented strategies and monitors the progress. Evaluation is the process which tracks the progress of organization in the term of change and by evaluating its influence in the organization. Organization development as a theory works in the organization. Change agent gets huge help from effective OD. OD is the field of practice and theory which dedicates to enhancing the knowledge and productivity of the people so that organizational change can be done in an efficient manner and the performance of the employees could get improved (Guler, 2010). The role of IT in organizational development is very important. In the context of change management, it is not possible for every time that change could accepted by everyone in easy manner. Changes in management require proper training to the employees so that they can understand the basic knowledge about the changes. Customers prefer internet to search data and commodities (Khan, et. al., 2011). IT can put its influence on the process and structure of organization. IT helps organization to gain the more competitive advantages. Change agent should provide proper training to the employees if any changes occur regarding IT. Changes in technology are normal. It is necessary to the change agent to take care of the employees and their skill while bringing change in the organization. In the case of changing in technology, team work plays a vital role. Change agent should appoint a team worker for support to the employees (Anderson, 2011). The role of team worker in the organization is to s upport to an individuals in their strength. It is a person who provides personal support and maintains the group harmony. Team member satisfaction and team spirit must to maintain the effectiveness of the organization. Flexibility is the positive attitude of team worker. However, IT changes bring the environment of comfort in the organization but it does not happen every time. Knowledge management projects starts in the organization with introduction of new technology where changes come in database and representation of database are involved in the new technology. Possibility of trapping through IT can be done in the organization. The trap can be cookie-cutter approach in the area of organization which enhances the possibility of failure. IT complexity is another trap for the organization. The higher complexity in the structure of IT brings the higher level of challenges in among employees. Team worker should focus on the irrelevancy of the performance so that wrong practices can be recognized as soon as possible. The reporting mechanism is monitoring the mission of an organization for ensuring successful use of IT in OD. Strategic objective of reporting mechanism is to raise awareness of consumer and business. It provides learning about the information technology (?iri? Rakovi?, 2010). Operational objectives of reporting mechanism is to share the information with relevancy and produce statistics so that organization can get prevent from threats. These objectives help out to the change agent or manager to take action as per requirement of change. It is important for the change management to assess the characteristics of the change. Change agent should focus on enterprise level instead of geographical spread. To exposing the failure, it is required to business should evaluate the existing project and the capabilities of change management and highlight the risk. Managing change is not being done by single hand; there should be contribution of both employee as w ell as manager. Involvement of the employee must in managing the change. Instead of forcing to the employees for accepting the change, manager or change agent should keep the policy of feedback. Change management can assess the feedback from employees and take corrective action. As it has been discussed above that for managing change, change agent appointed team worker and completer who will be able to provide the help to an individual towards changing (Eikenberry, 2011). To make an enterprise as per next generation, new thinking, technologies and procedures are required to consider. However, it is difficult to create a vision because it involves uncertainty, risk and chances of failure. Organizational development facilitate that organization is ready to accept the huge change in business scale and technology solutions. It provides the tools and technique to enhancing the productivity of the employees. Change management encourages employees to adopt and accept the changes. It helps to convert the strategic goals in to reality. Organizational development is not a fancy idea for brainwashing. It is a concept or process which never stops and diagnoses the issues in the organization. With the help of OD organization can analyze the situation and can take initiative action against issues. It is well planned strategy which is implemented for the purpose of enhancing the effectiveness of the employee towards performing the task. It put efforts to achieve the strategic goal. In the context of managing change in the organization, OD plays a vital role to give better understanding to the employees. OD theory includes organizational climate, attitude and behavior of an individual. By using knowledge management, organizational learning and transformation values of organization, OD focused on complex environments and changes. To making the change in organization, organizational development identifies the area in which changes are required. Each need or requirement has been analyzed and move ahead in the management plan. The management plan outlines the specific change that will improve the situation of the company (Burke, 2011). Without OD business would have a difficulty to develop an effective change management programs. In case of changing in organization, change agent or manager appoint or gives responsibility to specific person or make team who help to encourage employee towards accepting the change. Team worker, completer and chairpers on have been chosen as per belbin theory. They all have their own roles and responsibilities. Organizational development plays a crucial role to make an effective strategy and management. To analyze the work efficiency and accuracy, completer protect the team from mistakes and omission. Chair person communicates with their subordinate to accomplish a task with change management. Team worker maintain a team and provide possible training and development program. It has been concluded that change agent has various role to play to perform the task efficiently. Organizational development enhances the productivity of the employees. Various important aspects for the success of organizational change have been discussed in essay which is helpful to learner to gain more knowledge about the succession of change management. The role of chair person, team worker and completer has been mentioned and along with that their contribution in change management also being discussed. The theories of change management provide the huge support to make better understanding with employees towards change management. Organizational development is the field which analyzes the situation and provides the suggestion that which area of organization want change requirement. It mainly focuses on complex environment and tries to protect organization from threats. OD is not just a fancy idea for the organization while it is the process that is capable to enhance the effective ness of the organization. It is important for the change agent to take care of all aspects that may impact on other area of organization. Changing decision in any area of organization should be done after consulting with team members. It is concluded that effective strategy and OD make easy to take better understanding regarding changing in organization. References Anderson, L. A. (2011). The change leaders roadmap: How to navigate your organizations transformation. New York, NY: Routledge. Burke, W. W. (2011). Organizational change: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ?iri?, Z. Rakovi?, L. (2010). Change Management in Information System Development and Implementation Projects. Management Information Systems, Vol. 5 (2010), No. 2, pp. 023-028. Eikenberry, K. (2011). Championing change: Creating remarkable leaders. New York, NY:Wiley. Guler, S. (2010). Change Management A Case Study of SAP Implementation in a Major Company. Chalmers. Sweden. Jain, R. (2011). Managing research, development and innovation: Managing the unmanageable. New York, NY: Wiley. Khan, R. A. G., Khan, F. A., Khan, M. A. (2011). Impact of Training and Development on Organizational Performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research. Volume 11 Issue 7 Version 1.0 July 2011. Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Managing Change: The Role of the Change Agent. International journal of management, business, and administration. volume 13, number 1, 2010.

To Kill A Mocking Bird, A Harper Lee Classic And Pulitzer Prize Winner

To Kill a Mocking Bird, a Harper Lee classic and Pulitzer prize winner, is a controversial book . It deals with racism in the south, which means white vs. black. In the book, To Kill a Mocking Bird the community believes that the black man is guilty, despite any evidence, and will stop at nothing until he is dead. The notion that blacks are less human than whites is dispicable. The characters in this novel, knew full well that the black people were no different deep down inside. They taught there children that black people were inferior. Black people, were and are as good if not better, than the white people. Their brain power was equal to the white man's. The notion that black people's soul was different, and therefore it didn't matter what happened to them ,because they were all going to hell, was prevalent. The white people of the south in the 1930's, as depicted in To Kill a Mocking Bird, believed that blacks had inferior minds. That idea was atroshish because at that time black inventors were inventing all kinds of modern technology, like the neon light bulb. Black people were not inferior to the white, they just didn't have the advantages of a good education. If anything they were smarter, because they strived to learn . Black people were just as intellegent as the whites but were thought of as less, because they were different. The book also made the statement that black people were hard workers, who could do anything the white people could do and sometimes do it better. The black people also did their work for less money, and they still went out of their way to help the people that treated them different. Tom Robinson eventually lost his life by helping a white woman, who lied to hang an innocent man. She also covered up for a lazy white man who drank to much. This, in my mind, was the worst obstruction of justice ever. The consensus of opinion, in the 30's was that Black people would go to hell, so it didn't matter whether or not Tom Robinson hung. This is wrong, and the people that said it probably went to church every week, and sat in the front pew. However Aticus and the people at the black church, knew the truth, and served God regardless of the other people's beliefs. When Jem and Scout went to the Black church, they realized the truth too. The black people did everything just like them, and genuinely cared about people. The book To Kill a Mocking Bird, portrayed two different opinions. One was stronger than the other, and the other one was right. Black people are no different from white people. If only the majority of the Maycomb county people knew that in the 1930's, the outcome would have been different.